A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Update: Medicare Quality Measurement and Reporting Programs

Posted on September 19, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Key Developments
Implementation Briefs

By Jane Hyatt Thorpe and Teresa Cascio

Background

A February 2011 Implementation Brief titled “Medicare Quality Measurement and Reporting Programs” addressed Congress’ continuing efforts through the Affordable Care Act (ACA) to transition the Medicare program from a traditional volume-based fee for service purchaser of health care items and services to a value-based purchaser. The ACA took significant steps to move beyond financial and other incentives for quality measure development, measurement, and reporting to financial and other incentives for actual improvements in care delivery (e.g., value-based purchasing). Since the initial 2011 brief, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) has made significant progress in implementing Congress’ vision. That progress is described below.

Summary of Changes Made by the ACA (Pub. L. 111-148 §§ 3001-02, 3004-07, 3013-14, 10301, 10303 – 304, 10322, 10331, as modified by P.L. 111-152)

Quality Measure Development

  • Quality Measure Development:[1] Section 3013 requires the Secretary of HHS to identify gaps in existing quality measures and fund the development of quality measures to fill these gaps.
  • Development of Outcome Measures:[2] Section 10303 requires the Secretary to develop and update provider-level outcome measures for hospitals and physicians, as well as other providers as appropriate.
  • Quality Measure Selection:[1] The entity selected by the Secretary to develop quality measures (currently the National Quality Forum [NQF] as authorized under the Medicare Improvement for Patients and Providers Act of 2008 (MIPPA)) must convene a multi-stakeholder groups to provide input on the selection of quality measures and national priorities through an open and transparent process (currently the “Measures Applications Partnership”). Section 10304 adds the development of efficiency measures to the process. Selected measures will be used for existing and new Medicare (as well as Medicaid and CHIP) quality reporting and payment programs described below.

Quality Measurement

  • Improvements to Physician Quality Reporting System:[4] Section 3002 re-authorizes incentive payments under the Physician Quality Reporting Program through 2014 (maximum one percent of estimated allowed charges) and institutes a penalty for failure to report beginning in 2015 (maximum two percent).
  • Quality Reporting for Long-Term Care Hospitals, Inpatient Rehabilitation Hospitals, and Hospice Programs;[5] Quality Reporting for Psychiatric Hospitals:[6] The ACA establishes new quality measurement and reporting programs for these providers. Once operational, if a facility does not report selected quality measures, the facility’s annual update will be reduced by two percentage points.
  • Quality Reporting for PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals:[7] The ACA establishes a new quality measurement and reporting program for cancer hospitals that are exempt from the PPS. Once operational, if a cancer hospital does not report selected quality measures, the hospital’s annual Medicare market basket update will be reduced.
  • Value-based Purchasing Programs:[8] The ACA requires the implementation of value-based purchasing programs for hospitals (other than psychiatric hospitals, rehabilitation hospitals, children’s hospitals, long-term care hospitals, and certain cancer treatment and research facilities) and for physicians (through the use of a payment modifier). In addition, ACA requires the Secretary to develop plans to implement value-based purchasing programs for ambulatory surgery centers, skilled nursing facilities, and home health services.

Public Reporting

  • Public Reporting of Performance Information and Public Reporting of Quality Information for Other Providers:[9] The ACA requires CMS to establish a “Physician Compare” website that will publicly report information on physicians and other eligible professionals who participate in the Physician Quality Reporting Program. CMS, on behalf of the Secretary, must also publically report quality information obtained from the newly authorized quality reporting programs.

Implementation Updates

Physician Quality Reporting System (PQRS)

  • Status:[10] CMS proposes revisions to the PQRS in the Proposed 2013 Physician Fee Schedule (PFS) Rule.
  • Reporting Mechanisms:[11] CMS currently accepts quality data from individual eligible professionals via claims-based, registry-based, or Electronic Health Record (EHR)-based reporting while group practices must report through the Group Practice Reporting Option (GPRO) web-interface. CMS proposes to allow group practices comprised of 2-99 physicians to utilize the methods available to individual physicians during future reporting periods.
  • Reporting Requirements:[12] Individual physicians and groups qualify for the PQRS payment incentive, or avoid the 2015 payment adjustment, if they report quality data that meets the reporting criteria during the applicable reporting period. The reporting criteria and reporting periods, proposed by CMS, vary depending on the reporting mechanism and whether the reporting party is an individual or group. For example, CMS proposes to require individual eligible professionals reporting quality measures via the registry mechanism to “[r]eport at least 3 measures AND report each measure for at least 80 percent of [their] Medicare Part B FFS patients seen [between January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014]” in order to qualify for the 2014 incentive.
  • Quality Measures:[13] CMS proposes numerous NQF endorsed and MAP recommended measures for use during the 2013 reporting year and beyond. CMS has classified these proposed measures into six domains using the priorities established in the National Quality Strategy (Patient and Family Engagement, Patient Safety, Care Coordination, Population and Public Health, Efficient Use of Healthcare, and Clinical Processes/Effectiveness).

Physician Value-Based Payment Modifier

  • Status:[14] CMS issued proposed rules for a value-based payment modifier that will affect physician payments beginning in 2015. CMS believes that implementation of the value-based payment modifier should focus on: (1) “measurement and alignment;” (2) “physician choice;” (3) “shared accountability;” (4) “actionable information;” and (5) “gradual implementation.”
  • Application:[15] CMS proposes to apply the value-based modifier to all “physician groups” with at least 25 “eligible professionals.” CMS proposes to divide qualifying physician groups into two categories: (1) groups that submit PQRS quality measures during 2013 and 2014; and (2) groups that do not submit PQRS quality measures during 2013 and 2014. Groups that submit PQRS data will receive a default payment modifier of 0.0 percent unless, with the exception of groups participating in an ACO under the MSSP, they opt for CMS to apply a payment modifier calculated using a proposed quality tiering approach and their data submitted during 2013. Groups that opt into the payment modification risk a downward payment adjustment. Groups that fail to satisfactorily report PQRS quality measures during 2013 and 2014 will receive a payment modifier of -1.0 percent. CMS proposes to apply the value-based payment modification to all physicians and physician groups beginning in 2017. CMS seeks comment on whether to assess hospital-based physicians on the performance of their hospital.
  • Performance Period:[16] CMS will use data reported during 2013 to calculate the 2015 payment modifier and data reported in 2014 to calculate the 2016 payment modifier.
  • Payment Modifier:[17] CMS proposes to derive the payment modifier from physicians’ performance on both a quality of care composite and a cost composite. The quality of care composite will contain quality measures divided into domains based on the six National Quality Strategy Principles (clinical care, patient experience, population/community health, patient safety, care coordination, and efficiency) while the cost composite will consist of the “total overall costs” and “total costs for beneficiaries with specific conditions.”

PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospital Quality Reporting Program

  • Status.[18] CMS finalized rules for this program in the 2013 Inpatient Prospective Payment System Rule (IPPS).
  • Measures.[19] CMS must select measures endorsed by the NQF unless an appropriate NQF-endorsed measure is unavailable. CMS finalized the use of three cancer process of care measures, one bloodstream infection measure, and one urinary tract infection measure for the initial stages of the program.
  • Reporting Requirements.[20] CMS will collect data through the QualityNet website and CDC/NHSN. PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals must, among other actions, register for QualityNet, appoint a QualityNet administrator, and submit a Data Accuracy and Completeness Attestation (DACA) following data submission.
  • Public Reporting.[21] CMS will publically report the quality performance of PPS-Exempt Cancer Hospitals on the Hospital Compare website.

Long-Term Care Hospital Quality Reporting Program

  • Status:[22] CMS implemented the LTCH Quality Reporting Program in the 2012 IPPS and has finalized the following revisions in the final 2013 IPPS.
  • Quality Measures Retention:[23] Once adopted, CMS will retain all measures unless they otherwise propose to remove, replace, or suspend an adopted measure.
  • Retained Measures for 2014:[24] CMS will retain the following measures that have undergone NQF revision: (1) National Health and Safety Network (NHSN) Catheter Associated Urinary Tract Infection (CAUTI) Outcome Measure (NQF #0138); (2) NHSN Central Line Associated Blood Stream Infection (CLABSI) Outcome Measure (NQF #0139); and (3) Percent of Residents with Pressure Ulcers That are New or Worsened (Short-Stay) (NQF #0678).
  • New Measures for 2016 and Beyond:[25] CMS has adopted the following measures for 2016 and beyond: (1) Percent of Nursing Home Residents Who Were Assessed and Appropriately Given the Seasonal Influenza Vaccine (Short-Stay) (NQF #0680); (2) Percent of Residents Assessed and Appropriately Given the Pneumococcal Vaccine (Short-Stay) (NQF #0682); (3) Influenza Vaccination Coverage among Healthcare Personnel (NQF #0431); and (4) Ventilator Bundle (NQF #0302). CMS did not finalize their proposed adoption of a Restraint Rate per 1,000 Patient Days measure after receiving comments that cast doubt on its appropriateness for use in LTCH Quality Reporting Program. CMS intends to propose an appropriate patient restraint measure in the future.
  • Data Submission Timelines:[26] LTCHs must submit quarterly data on discharges occurring between January 1, 2013 and December 31, 2013 and January 1, 2014 and December 31, 2014 in order to meet, respectively, the 2015 payment determination and 2016 payment determination requirements.

Hospice Quality Reporting Program

  • Status:[27] CMS finalized initial requirements for the Hospice Quality Reporting Program in the Hospice Wage Index Year 2012 Final Rule and proposes additional requirements in the proposed 2013 Home Health Prospective Payment System (PPS) Rule.
  • Quality Measures and Data Submission Requirements:[28] Hospices must submit the following measures for 2014: (1) NQF measure “#0209: The percentage of patients who report being uncomfortable because of pain on the initial assessment (after admission to hospice services) who report pain was brought to a comfortable;” and (2) “Participation in a Quality Assessment and Performance Improvement (QAPI) program that includes at least three quality indicators related to patient care.” Hospices must collect data for these measures between October 1, 2012 and December 31, 2012 and submit the NQF measure by April 1, 2013 and the QAPI measure by January 31, 2013. CMS notes that hospices’ performance on these measures is immaterial to satisfying the Hospice QRP requirements. Hospices must report their data through a CMS provided Internet tool. CMS proposes to use these measures for 2015 and beyond.
  • Data Availability:[29] CMS plans to publically report quality data, as required by the ACA, once they finish developing standardized and uniform data sets. Details regarding such reporting will appear in future notices of rulemaking.

Inpatient Psychiatric Facilities (IPF) Quality Reporting Program

  • Status:[30] CMS finalized rules for the IPF Quality Reporting Program in the 2013 IPPS.
  • Quality Measures:[31] CMS finalized the use of six NQF-endorsed measures for use in the program beginning in 2014. These measures include two care coordination measures: “Post-Discharge Continuing Care Plan Created” and “Post-Discharge Continuing Care Plan Transmitted to Next Level of Care Provider Upon Discharge.”
  • Reporting Procedures:[32] CMS finalized its plan to collect data through the QualityNet website. IPFs must, among other actions, register for QualityNet, appoint a QualityNet administrator, and submit a Data Accuracy and Completeness Attestation (DACA) following data submission.

Key Issues

  • Administrative Burden: Many of the providers participating in the Medicare Meaningful Use EHR Incentive Program must also submit quality data pursuant to one of the quality reporting programs described above in order to avoid a payment reduction. Reporting to multiple programs has the potential to increase providers’ administrative burden. CMS must continue to identify opportunities to align the quality reporting programs with the EHR Meaningful Use Incentive Program’s Requirements.
  • Measure Maintenance: CMS will subject quality reporting measures to formal rulemaking if the NQF makes substantive changes to the measures during the maintenance process. However, CMS will simply update the applicable specifications manual if the NQF maintenance process results in non-substantive changes to the measures. CMS provides examples of substantive and non-substantive changes, but does not clearly define either term.[33] The lack of a clear standard could lead to future confusion related to measure revisions.
  • Disparate Impact: The quality reporting programs may have a disparate impact on smaller, rural, and/or community health providers as these providers may not have the resources and infrastructure necessary to satisfy CMS’s quality reporting criteria and thus cannot participate in the quality reporting programs. This is particularly concerning as the quality reporting programs begin to transition from providing incentives to participants to adjusting the payment of nonparticipants. The physician payment-modifier, though risk-adjusted, may also have a disparate impact on physicians that serve high-risk populations as their population base may lead to payment adjustments that do not accurately reflect the quality of care.
  • Impact: As the volume of quality measurement information continues to grow from a broader scope of providers, CMS will need to remain vigilant that the information is publicly reported in a manner that in meaningful and actionable for consumers and other stakeholders and that fosters greater care coordination.


[1] Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (Pub. L. 111-148) §3013 (2010).
[2] PPACA § 10303.
[3] 76 Fed. Reg. 7769.
[4] PPACA § 3002.
[5] PPACA §§ 3004, 10322.
[6] PPACA §§ 3004, 10322.
[7] PPACA § 3005.
[8] PPACA §§ 3001, 3007, 3006, 10301.
[9] PPACA §§ 3004, 3005, 10322.
[10] Medicare Program; Revisions to Payment Policies Under the Physician Fee Schedule, DME Face to Face Encounters, Elimination of the Requirement for Termination of Non- Random Prepayment Complex Medical Review and Other Revisions to Part B for CY 2013; Hospital Outpatient Prospective and Ambulatory Surgical Center Payment Systems and Quality Reporting Programs; Electronic Reporting Pilot; Inpatient Rehabilitation Facilities Quality Reporting Program; Quality Improvement Organization Regulations; Proposed Rules, 77 FED. REG. 44722, 44774 (July 30, 2012).
[11] 77 Fed. Reg. at 44808-13.
[12] 77 Fed. Reg. at 44818.
[13] 77 Fed. Reg. at 44826.
[14] 77 Fed. Reg. at 44994-95.
[15] 77 Fed. Reg. at 44997.
[16] Id.
[17] 77 Fed. Reg. at 45007.
[18] Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long- Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Fiscal Year 2013 Rates; Hospitals’ Resident Caps for Graduate Medical Education Payment Purposes; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers and for Ambulatory Surgical Centers, 77 Fed. Reg. 53258, 53555 (Aug. 31, 2012).
[19] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53561.
[20] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53563.
[21] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53566.
[22] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53614.
[23] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53615.
[24] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53623.
[25] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53636.
[26] Id.
[27] 77 Fed. Reg. at 41573.
[28] 77 Fed. Reg. at 41573-75.
[29] 77 Fed. Reg. at 41573.
[30] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53644.
[31] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53652.
[32] 77 Fed. Reg. at 53654-55.
[33] Medicare Program; Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment Systems for Acute Care Hospitals and the Long- Term Care Hospital Prospective Payment System and Fiscal Year 2013 Rates; Hospitals’ Resident Caps for Graduate Medical Education Payment Purposes; Quality Reporting Requirements for Specific Providers and for Ambulatory Surgical Centers, 77 Fed. Reg. 27870,28092 (May 11, 2012).

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

A final rule released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) is designed to loosen policies that could save hospitals up to $3.2 billion over the next five years. One policy addressed removes the requirement that a physician must be present at a rural health center every two weeks, which was implemented to help combat the shortage of rural health providers. The rule also relaxes supervision requirements for some providers, such as dieticians. Easing regulations under this rule follows suit with the administration's "regulatory lookback" that began in 2012.
A final rule released on Tuesday indicates that federally qualified health centers (FQHCs) may receive a 32% payment boost under Medicare's new payment system. Effective October 1st of this year, Medicare will pay FQHCs a per member per day fee of $158.85, which will be adjusted for geographic differences in healthcare costs. The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) currently does not adjust payments for FQHC patients. Another rule released by CMS discusses inpatient payment regulations for 2015. Per the Hospital Readmission Reduction Program, Medicare payments to physicians with poor readmission rates could be reduced by as much as 3%. Hospitals with poor performance regarding hospital acquired conditions may face an additional penalty. Other payment rules released by CMS include skilled nursing facilities, rehabilitation facilities, and psychiatric facilities, which all call for payment increases of 2%, 2.2%, and 2.1% respectively.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a proposed rule of more than 1400 pages describing the new Medicare payment schedule for 2014. The annual Acute Care Hospital Inpatient Prospective Payment System (IPPS) rule proposes that general acute-care hospitals will see a payment increase of 0.8% and long-term care hospitals will see their payments rise by 1.1%. Pursuant to the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the NRPM also details the new penalty program for hospitals that do not reduce nosocomial infections, adding hip and knee implants and chronic obstructive pulmonary disorder to the 30 day readmission penalty program. Another component of the proposed rule alters Medicare disproportionate share hospital (DSH) payments. Additional payments to each hospital will be made based upon its percentage of the total uncompensated care rendered at all DSH hospitals at a given time, ultimately reducing overall DSH payments by 0.9%. Furthermore, hospitals that do not participate in the Hospital Inpatient Quality Reporting (IQR) Program will be subject to additional penalties. Comments will be due by June 25th, 2013.
Yesterday, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) issued a proposed rule, which would reform Medicare regulations that CMS has identified as unnecessary, obsolete, or excessively burdensome on health care providers and suppliers, as well as certain regulations under the Clinical Laboratory Improvement Amendments of 1988 (CLIA). The rule would enable health care professionals to devote resources to improving patient care through the elimination or improvement of requirements that currently impede quality or divert resources.
The Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) released a request for information (RFI), seeking comments regarding health plan quality management in the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) exchanges. In the RFI, CMS said it intends to propose a phased approach to quality reporting. CMS said no new quality reporting standards would be put in place until 2016. The purpose of the RFI is to seek information regarding what quality improvement strategies health insurance issuers currently use, what opportunities exist to further the goals of the National Quality Strategy through quality reporting requirements in the exchanges, and what factors should be integrated in designing an approach to meaningfully calculate health plan value. CMS also published a release regarding Medicaid/Children's Health Insurance Program (CHIP) ACA implementation. In the release, CMS said that Medicaid programs in states that are not expanding Medicaid or building their own exchanges must still coordinate with the federally facilitated exchanges. Beginning in 2014, the ACA requires states to convert to an electronic eligibility and enrollment system for Medicaid and CHIP that makes an eligibility determination based on an applicant's modified adjusted gross income (MAGI). The new electronic system will also determine eligibility for federal subsidies on the exchange. The original ACA electronic system upgrades were planned as a part of the nationwide Medicaid expansion. However, in the wake of the June Supreme Court decision, states are no longer obligated to participate in the expansion. This release clarifies that "State Medicaid and CHIP programs will need to coordinate with the federally-facilitated exchange, regardless of a state's decision to proceed with expansion."
On November 19, 2013, the Obama Administration published a Notice with comment that describes the overall Quality Rating System (QRS) framework for rating the quality of health plans (QHPs) sold in the health insurance Marketplace (another term for Exchanges). The purpose of the Notice is to solicit comments on the framework. Comments must be received by January 21, 2014. Comments are sought on both the proposed quality measures that QHP issuers would be expected to report, as well as on ways to preserve the integrity of QHP ratings and on areas for future measurement...
Experts and stakeholders agree the current health care system is unsustainable. By 2020, health care spending will comprise almost 20% of the gross domestic product. Furthermore, an ever growing body of evidence clearly indicates that the system is not experiencing improvements in quality that are reflective of the cost growth. The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) takes significant strides towards the transformation of the American health care delivery system from a system that rewards volume to a system that rewards quality and value. The programs and initiatives...