A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Update: Health Insurance Premium Tax Credit Final Regulations

Posted on June 22, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Library
Key Developments

By Nancy Lopez

Background

On May 18, 2012, the Department of Treasury (Treasury) issued final regulations[1] on the health insurance premium tax credits enacted by the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA).[2] The final regulations, which took effect May 23, 2012, contain amendments to the Income Tax Regulations (26 CFR part 1) and address several issues noted in the proposed regulations (NPRM) issued by the Treasury on August 17, 2011. The refundable premium tax credits were created to help make the purchase of health insurance through the health insurance Exchanges more affordable for low- to middle-income individuals ineligible for Medicaid and without affordable employer coverage. An earlier Implementation Brief provided an overview of the premium tax credits; this Update describes the key provisions of the final regulations.

Key Modifications made by the Final Regulations

Definitions

Family and Family Size: In response to public comments, the final regulations clarify that a family includes both individuals that are exempt from the requirement to maintain essential coverage under ACA section 5000A(e), as well as those individuals who are not subject to the 5000A penalty.[3]

Modified Adjusted Income: The final regulations amend the proposed definition to include Social Security benefits not included in gross income pursuant to the Withholding Repeal and Job Creation Act,[4] which was enacted after the NPRM.[5]

Federal Poverty Line: The final regulations clarify that if a married couple or individual resides in two separate states with differing Federal poverty guidelines during the year, then the Federal poverty line that applies for purposes of 36B is the higher poverty line.[6]

Rating Area: The proposed regulations had defined “rating area” as the Exchange service area but in response to comments that an Exchange service area is different from a rating area, the final regulations leave the definition reserved for further determination.[7]

Premium Tax Credit and Federal Programs

  • The final regulations extend the time in which individuals must complete the requirements necessary to receive coverage from government-sponsored programs, by deleting the proposed words “reasonable promptness” for the time required to complete such requirements and instead allows the individual up to three months following an eligibility determination to complete the requirements.[8]
  • Additional guidance will be provided on when or if an individual becomes “eligible for government-sponsored minimum essential coverage” because of a particular illness or condition.[9]

Premium Tax Credits and Employer-Sponsored Coverage

The final regulations:

  • do not address the most criticized provision of the proposed regulations — that employer affordability is based on the employee’s cost for an individual plan — except to state that the affordability issue would be addressed in future guidance, along with determining minimum value and eligibility of dependents for the premium tax credit.[10]
  • authorize the Commissioner of Internal Revenue to provide future guidance on how wellness program incentives that increase or decrease the employee’s share of premiums affect the affordability of eligible employer-sponsored coverage.[11] Comments are requested regarding wellness incentives.
  • provide that the affordability safe harbor will not apply to a taxpayer who, with reckless disregard, misrepresents to the Exchange an employee’s portion of annual premiums.[12] The final regulations further clarify that the affordability safe harbor only applies until the availability of employer sponsored coverage changes at which point a new affordability determination is required.[13] If an employer imposes a ninety-day waiting period before the employee is eligible for coverage, the employee (or related individual) is eligible for the premium tax credit until coverage become available.[14]
  • allow employees who are automatically enrolled in coverage that is unaffordable to be eligible for the premium tax credits if the employee (or related individual) disenrolls before the last day of any opt out period or the first day of the second full calendar month of plan year.[15]
  • provide that non-dependent individuals who are eligible to enroll in minimal essential coverage because of their relationship to another person who is eligible for such coverage (e.g., a domestic partner) are not automatically disqualified from receiving a premium tax credit.[16]

Computing of Premium Tax Credit

The final regulations:

  • provide that an individual is eligible for a premium tax credit for a month (called a “coverage month”) if the individual was not eligible for minimum essential coverage for at least one day of the month and the individual was enrolled in a qualified health plan on the first of that month. However, the individual will not be entitled to a premium tax credit for that month if the taxpayer’s monthly share of premiums is not paid in full by the unextended tax return filing deadline.[17]
  • provide that if at least one silver-level health plan in the Exchange does not cover all the members of the taxpayer’s family (e.g., because of non-traditional relationships) under one policy, then the premium for the applicable benchmark plan is the premium for a single policy or a combination of premiums that is the second-lowest silver option for covering the entire family.[18]
  • reserves for future guidance the rule for determining the appropriate benchmark plan for families with members that live in different geographical regions.[19]


[1] 77 Fed. Reg. 30377 (May 18, 2012), amending 26 CFR Parts 1 and 602 (Comments accepted until August 21, 2012).
[2] PPACA §1401, adding §36B to the Internal Revenue Code.
[3] 26 CFR §1.36B-1(d).
[4] P.L. 112-56 (125 Stat. 711 (2011)).
[5] 26 CFR §1.36B-1(e)(2).
[6] 26 CFR §1.36B-1(h).
[7] 26 CFR 1.36B-1(n).
[8] 26 CFR §1.36B-2(c)(2)(ii).
[9] 77 Fed. Reg. Preamble at 30380.
[10] 77 Fed. Reg. Preamble at 30380.
[11] 26 CFR §1.36B-2(c)(3)(v)(A)(4).
[12] 26 CFR §1.36B-2(c)(3)(v)(A)(3).
[13] 77 Fed. Reg. preamble at 30380.
[14] 26 CFR §1.36-2(c)(3)(iii)(B).
[15] 26 CFR §1.36B-2(c)(3)(vii)(B).
[16] 77 Fed. Reg. Preamble at 30382.
[17] 26 CFR 1.36B-3(c).
[18] 26 CFR 1.36B-3(f)(3).
[19] 26 CFR §1.36B-3(f)(4).

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

A memorandum from the Congressional Research Service (CRS) released by the House Energy and Commerce Committee states that a "literal application" of the law would prohibit premium subsidies to be offered for plans sold outside of the Affordable Care Act's Marketplaces. The memo also provided means by which the administration could argue they possessed the authority to offer subsidies outside of the Marketplaces.
A report recently released by The Brookings Institution stated that the Affordable Care Act (ACA) will lead to a redistribution of incomes. Specifically, the report cited that individuals with incomes in the bottom 20% of the population will see a 6% increase due to the availability of subsidies and Medicaid expansion, while individuals in higher income brackets may see a slight reduction in their incomes based upon higher taxes and shifts in the insurance market. Of note, the authors of the report include "government and employer contributions to health insurance" in their determinations for income.
An analysis performed by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that nearly 6 in 10 Americans eligible to participate in the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) health insurance marketplaces, which equates to 17 million individuals, will qualify for insurance subsidies. To receive a subsidy through the ACA, individuals must earn between 100-400% of the federal poverty line. Most of the individuals qualifying for subsidies reside in Texas, California, and Florida. The analysis was based on population and economic data collected by the Census Bureau for 2012 and 3013, stated that.
A new study released by the Kaiser Family Foundation found that about half of the individuals entering the health insurance Marketplaces created by the Affordable Care Act (ACA) may be eligible for premium tax credits. The study, Quantifying Tax Credits for People Now Buying Insurance on Their Own, estimated that around 48% of those currently enrolled in the individual market would be eligible for subsidies if they joined the ACA Marketplaces, and families could be eligible for an average subsidy of $5,548. Information from the study was based upon premium estimates from the Congressional Budget Office and estimates from the Survey of Income and Program Participation.
A new report from the Congressional Research Service (CRS) describes the application of premium credits to help individuals subsidize their health insurance purchased through the Affordable Care Act's (ACA) Exchanges. The report, Health Insurance Premium Credits in the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA), provides examples as to how premium tax credits would be allocated based upon age and income level, assuming the credits were operational and applicable to 2012. The memo states that premium tax credits are advanceable, refundable, and reconcilable. Additionally, cost-sharing subsidies, such as reduced co-payments, may be available for some individuals with lower incomes. Another CRS memo provides a basic overview of the individual mandate, the requirement of all Americans, with the exception of individuals qualifying for exemptions, to obtain minimum essential coverage. Those that are not exempt and remain non-compliant with the mandate will be assessed a penalty beginning in 2014. In addition to penalty assessment, the memo explains the reporting requirements associated with the ACA. Individual Mandate and Related Information Requirements under ACA was commissioned in response to HR 2668, the Fairness for American Families Act, which delays the implementation of the individual mandate to 2015. In response to the delay of the employer shared responsibility payment, or the employer mandate, CRS also released a report detailing impact the decision may have on health insurance coverage and eligibility. Some of the potential issues addressed in the CRS memo include: fewer than anticipated "large" employers offering insurance coverage, more than anticipated employees qualifying for premium tax credits, and concerns with verification of tax credit eligibility to prevent fraud and abuse. This report was released in regards to HR 2667, Delay in Implementation of Potential Employer Penalties Under ACA, the legislative delay of the ACA employer penalties.
Guidance issued by the Center for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) states that individuals who enrolled in health plans outside of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) insurance Marketplaces may retroactively receive premium subsidies. Under the ACA, advanced premium tax credits, or subsidies, are only available to individuals that purchased qualified health plans through the Marketplace. Many states have asked CMS to permit subsidies outside of the ACA Marketplace because IT issues prevented many eligible individuals from enrolling into QHPs before the deadline. Subsidies will retroactively be paid to insurers back to the effective date of plan enrollment.
A report released this morning by the Treasury Inspector General for Tax Administration (TIGTA) found that the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) should "strengthen systems development controls" for the issuance of tax credits under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Subsidies to help qualifying Americans purchase health insurance will be issued and monitored by the IRS. In the report, Affordable Care Act: Improvements Are Needed to Strengthen Systems Development Controls for the Premium Tax Credit Project, TIGTA stated that the agency needs to improve the software and update the systems used to detect fraud and ensure security of consumer information.
The Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released two Computer Matching Agreements, one with the Internal Revenue Service (IRS) and another with the Veterans Health Administration, which permit the sharing of data necessary for the operation of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). In particular, this agreement permits the IRS to share tax return data with CMS, enabling the verification of household size and income to determine premium tax credit eligibility under the ACA. The Computer Matching Agreement between the agencies is required under the 1974 Privacy Act and describes the requisite steps with which agencies must comply when they intend to share data. Update: On August 16th, CMS announced additional data sharing agreements with the Department of Homeland Security and US Citizenship and Immigration Services.
A new set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQ) released by the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) clarifies how health insurance Marketplaces will verify incomes of applicants that qualify for premium tax credits or cost-sharing reductions. In a previous rule released on July 5, 2013, CMS stated that for 2014 only, Marketplaces may use a statistically significant sample when requesting additional income documentation under scenarios where Marketplace applicant projects an annual household income is that at least 10% below available IRS and SSA data, Equifax data is unavailable, and the individual does not provide a reasonable explanation for the discrepancy between the attestation and available data.  In the new FAQ, CMS ultimately determined that for those enrolling in federally-facilitated Marketplaces, they have sufficient resources to request and process additional income documentation such that the sample size is 100%. However, CMS is still allowing state-based Marketplaces to determine their own sample size percentage for this group, as long as it is statistically significant.