RWJF releases report on Medicaid expansion

Posted on October 8, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Library
Implementation Briefs
Key Developments

A report recently released by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation (RWJF) serves as a guide for states considering Medicaid expansion in the wake of the U.S. Supreme Court decision. The analysis in the RWJF report is limited to financial considerations related to a state’s decision to expand and therefore does not include many financial aspects related to the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as a whole (remaining mandatory provisions, for example).

There are six main areas of financial analysis that all states should consider that are included in this report:

1. Cost of newly eligibles

2. Cost of currently eligible but not enrolled

3. Administrative costs

4. Savings from transitioning current Medicaid populations to newly eligible group

5. Savings from reduction in state programs for the uninsured

6. Other revenue gains and savings.

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities (CBPP) released a report to help state policymakers design waiver proposals for alternative approaches to expanding Medicaid. Arkansas, Iowa, and Michigan have all been granted waivers by the federal government to expand their Medicaid programs through alternative methods. The report outlines what federal officials have previously permitted and refused to help newly interested  states successfully obtain a waiver.
The recent announcement that some states are considering expanding Medicaid using private health insurance through the health insurance exchanges has created a flurry of debate. HHS has said that it is willing to approve a concept submitted by Arkansas, using an approach called “premium assistance,” which lets Medicaid cover the cost of private insurance. The premium assistance option has been available for many years under the Medicaid statute, but linkage to the health insurance exchanges has only become possible with the ACA. This brief commentary is a follow-up on earlier reports in Health Reform GPS discussing this topic; it focuses on the evidentiary basis that undergird some of these policy issues.
A new study released by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation and Urban Institute describes the financial burden of medical spending on a state-by-state basis. Using this information, the study hones in on the number of individuals per state that experience high burdens from medical spending, yet currently are not eligible for Medicaid. The study found that Medicaid expansion, under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), has the potential to mitigate the financial burden from medical spending for several vulnerable populations in various regions across the country.
A new brief released by Manatt Health Solutions, in partnership with the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation, outlines some of the issues states may encounter in pursuit of using premium assistance to purchase private insurance through the state marketplace for Medicaid-eligible adults. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), states have the option to expand their Medicaid eligibility requirements and receive additional federal funding to cover the costs of insuring the newly included population. Several states have been conversing with the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) over the possibility of using the federal monies granted to them for expansion to provide their Medicaid population with private insurance. This brief addresses several potential legal, operational and policy issues with this option, including how to ensure that Medicaid participants retain their rights as Medicaid beneficiaries while receiving coverage from a private insurer.
According to a brief released by the American Academy of Actuaries, state decisions regarding Medicaid expansion could significantly impact premiums for private insurance coverage. The brief found that premiums could increase in states that opt out of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) Medicaid expansion provision, as well as in those states that do decide to participate. In states that opt out of the expansion...
The Government Accountability Office (GAO) recently released a report on Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The report does not take into account the June 28th United States Supreme Court decision. Congress asked the GAO to report on the actions states are taking to implement the Medicaid expansion. This report addresses the following questions...
Beginning in 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provides for the expansion of Medicaid eligibility to adults with incomes up to 138% FPL ($15,415 for an individual or $26,344 for a family of three in 2012), which would make millions of currently uninsured adults newly eligible for the program. The Supreme Court ruling maintains the Medicaid expansion, but limits the Secretary’s authority to enforce it—if a state does not implement the expansion, the Secretary can withhold federal ACA expansion funds, but not existing federal program funds. This change in enforcement authority may impact state decisions to implement the expansion. A brief recently released by the Kaiser Family Foundation's Commission on Medicaid and the Uninsured provides an overview of current Medicaid eligibility for adults and data on uninsured adults to provide greater insight into the implications of the ACA Medicaid expansion on coverage for adults across states.
Two new reports, released by the New England Journal of Medicine, analyze the impact of Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). "The Supreme Court and the Future of Medicaid," authored by Timothy Stoltzfus Jost and Sara Rosenbaum, reviews both the Supreme Court’s majority and dissenting Medicaid expansion arguments and addresses three outstanding questions regarding the ruling. On June 28th...
On February 28th, 2013, Politico reported that Arkansas Governor Mike Beebe had received approval “to take federal Medicaid expansion money and use it to buy private health coverage for low-income residents through the state’s insurance exchange.” This Implementation Brief explains the legal basis for this decision, as well as the issues that can be expected to arise in using this approach to coverage.
On December 10, 2012, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a long-awaited set of frequently asked questions on Exchanges, market reforms, and Medicaid. We will post a further analysis of these FAQs in the near future, but we rush to post one question and answer because of its significance in relation to the Medicaid expansion...
On December 10, 2012, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) released a long-awaited set of frequently asked questions on Exchanges, market reforms, and Medicaid. We will post a further analysis of these FAQs in the near future, but we rush to post one question and answer because of its significance in relation to the Medicaid expansion...