A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

NAMD policy brief encourages states to seek sustainable Medicaid reforms as they reduce state budgets

Posted on July 23, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Library
Implementation Briefs
Key Developments

The National Association of Medicaid Directors’s  (NAMD’s) new policy brief intends to engage states in shared learning around how Medicaid directors can drive payment and delivery system innovations. The financial climate has caused many states to put pressure on Medicaid Directors to find cost savings wherever they can. To a large extent, states have addressed the inefficiencies in their programs. To fill growing budget holes, states have turned to more blunt instruments, such as cutting benefits, cutting eligibility, and cutting provider rates. This NAMD report encourages states to seek more sustainable reforms that allow the Medicaid program to provide high-quality services while reducing the share of health care programs consume in state budgets. To aid in implementing these initiatives, NAMD supports networking among Medicaid directors on current delivery and payment reforms in their states. States shared their experiences, including challenges and lessons learned.

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

The National Association of Medicaid Directors (NAMD) issued an overview recapping the first week of open enrollment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The publication, NAMD ACA Implementation Snapshot–Open Enrollment, Week 1, provides a qualitative description of how states experienced the first week of the ACA. Specifically, the snapshot describes state and federal communications, media and messaging, state eligibility systems, and state to Federally-Facilitated Marketplace (FFM) transfers and hub connectivity.
The National Association of Medicaid Directors (NAMD) recently published a white paper on Medicaid system reform efforts. Over the past year, NAMD has been working, with support from the Commonwealth Fund, to collect a growing catalog of "best practices" and innovative state initiatives. NAMD details the results of these efforts in the paper, which identifies and addresses the major barriers and the most likely pathways to Medicaid-driven and Medicaid-relevant health system reform.
The State Budget Crisis Task Force recently released a report identifying Medicaid growth as one of six major areas affecting states' fiscal stability. The others include federal deficit reduction efforts, underfunded retirement commitments, narrow and eroding tax bases, local governments' fiscal problems, and state laws. The report cited increasing enrollments, escalating health care costs, and difficulty implementing cost reduction proposals as reasons for Medicaid's rapid cost growth. The State Budget Crisis Task Force report also noted that Medicaid recently passed k-12 education as the largest area of state spending when all funds are considered. The report cites the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which found that Medicaid costs will likely grow at an average annual rate of 8.1 percent between 2012 and 2020 if the Affordable Care Act (ACA) reforms are implemented and at a rate of 6.6 percent if they are not. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ACA's Medicaid expansion provision but made it optional for the states.
The Center on Budget Policy and Priorities (CBPP) published an article which found that the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) Medicaid expansion would "add very little to what states would have spent on Medicaid without health reform, while providing health coverage to 17 million more low-income adults and children." The paper reported that "contrary to claims made by some of the Medicaid expansion’s critics, the expansion does not impose substantial financial burdens on states," as the additional projected spending "equals 2.8 percent of what states would have spent on Medicaid in the absence of health reform."
In a new report, The Center on Budget and Policy Priorities takes on several studies by Milliman, Inc. commissioned by state officials critical of the health reform law. CBPP finds they "produce overstated estimates of the costs of the Medicaid expansion because they rely on a number of problematic assumptions."
In NFIB v Sebelius the United States Supreme Court upheld the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA or the Act). At the same time, the decision adds a new dimension to the implementation of §2001(a) of the Act, which establishes expanded Medicaid eligibility for certain low-income people. This Implementation Brief begins with a discussion of exactly what the Court held in its Medicaid ruling. It then discusses the significance of the majority conclusion, as well as the key implementation questions that arise in the wake of this opinion.
Today, President Obama released the fiscal year 2013 (FY2013) budget. The budget totals $940.9 billion, and outlays $76.7 billion for the Department of Health and Human Services: 56 percent for Medicare, 30 percent for Medicaid and 8 percent for discretionary programs. The department will use these funds to invest in health care, disease prevention, social services, and scientific research. The budget seeks $358.5 billion in savings in Medicare and Medicaid...