A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

High Risk Pools for Uninsured Persons with Pre-Existing Conditions

Posted on April 22, 2010 | Comments (3)

PDF Version
Details
Key Developments
Library

Background

Beginning in 2014, individuals who do not have access to affordable employer coverage will be eligible to purchase insurance (with subsidies, if they qualify) through state health insurance exchanges regardless of any pre-existing conditions. In the near term, however, the question is how to help individuals who may not be able to obtain coverage because of a pre-existing condition. The health reform law immediately prohibits insurers and health plans from denying coverage to children under 19 because of pre-existing conditions,[1] but the law contains no similar provision for adults.

Thirty-five states operated high risk pools as of 2010. A high risk pool makes health insurance available to persons with pre-existing conditions who cannot qualify for insurance because of a pre-existing condition. But state high risk pools cover relatively few people because of their high premium costs, which can range from 125 percent to 200 percent of the standard individual insurance premium rate charged to a standard population with no underlying health conditions.[2]

Changes Made by the Health Reform Law
Pub. L. 111-148, §1101

  • The law directs the Secretary of Health and Human Services to establish a “temporary high risk health insurance pool program”[3] to provide health insurance coverage for “eligible individuals.”[4] An eligible individual is a citizen, a U.S. national, or an individual who is lawfully present in the United States, who has a pre-existing condition and has not been “covered under creditable coverage”[5] for six months before applying for enrollment.[6]
  • The law defines a “qualified high risk pool”[7] as one that:
    • Provides “all eligible individuals” health insurance without “any pre-existing condition exclusion” on coverage.
    • Guarantees a minimum actuarial value, specifying that the “insurer’s share of the total allowed cost of benefits provided … is not less than 65 percent of such costs.”
    • Limits out-of-pocket costs for covered services to no more than $5950 for an individual and twice the amount for family coverage (or an alternative amount specified by the Secretary if necessary to assure that the pool meets the 65 percent medical loss ratio test);
    • Assures that premium rating varies only by rating area, tobacco use, whether the coverage is on an individual or family basis, and age. (Age variations are restricted to no more than a four-to-one ratio.)
    • Charges participants the standard rate for individual coverage without taking into account any additional costs possibly arising from their health conditions.
  • The law terminates the federal high risk insurance pool on January 1, 2014, when the health insurance exchanges begin, and requires the Secretary to “develop procedures to provide for the transition of eligible individuals into “qualified health plans”[8] offered through exchanges.
  • The law requires the Secretary to make adjustments to eliminate deficits in any fiscal year she estimates that the “aggregate amounts available for the payment of the expenses of the high risk pool will be less than the actual amount of [pool] expenses.”[9]
  • The law provides that the standards governing a federally funded high risk pool shall “supersede any state law or regulation (other than . . . .licensing or . . . . solvency) with respect to qualified high risk pools which are established”[10] under the law.
  • The law allows the Secretary to carry out the program either directly or through contracts to “eligible entities,”[11] including states or nonprofit private entities. States that seek to operate a pool must fund risk pools at the same level as the year before  the first year of operation under a federal contract.
  • The law requires the Secretary to establish “protections against dumping risk by insurers”[12] and to determine “whether health insurance issuers and employment-based health plans have discouraged an individual from remaining enrolled in ‘prior coverage’[13] based on that individual’s health status.” The law directs the Secretary to develop review criteria for measuring dumping risk, which must include “at least the following circumstances:”[14]
    • In the case of insurance obtained either directly from an insurer or under an employer plan, either “the provision of money or other financial consideration for disenrolling.”
    • Age-adjusting the premiums to exceed those required under the program.
    • Stopping active marketing of  certain policies that previously were offering.
    • Conditioning the renewal price on the “duration coverage [from] issue or health status are factors that can be considered in determining premiums at renewal.”[15]
  • The law directs the Secretary to establish an appeals process to “enable individuals to appeal a determination” and “procedures to protect against waste, fraud and abuse.”[16]

Implementation

Agency and timeline

The United States Department of Health and Human Services is responsible for implementing and overseeing the high risk insurance pool. The health reform law specifies a 90-day implementation period, but does not provide specific direction regarding the administrative process to be used. HHS therefore has the discretion to use a range of implementation tools such as publishing regulations in the Federal Register with a public notice and comment period, or by other approaches such as posted policy instructions, announcements of funding availability announcements (where applicable), official letters to affected entities (such as letters to state Medicaid agencies) and posted rulings and notices. Agency websites can be regularly checked for updates.

Process

The Secretary of HHS began to solicit state interest on April 2, 2010, through a letter setting forth program elements.

Key Implementation Issues

  • For states:
    • What options will states have in terms of structuring their pools? The April 2 HHS letter sets forth five options: Operate a new high risk pool alongside a current state high risk pool, establish a new high risk pool (in a state that does not currently have a high risk pool), build upon other existing coverage programs designed to cover high risk individuals, contract with a current HIPAA carrier of last resort or another carrier to provide subsidized coverage for the eligible population, or do nothing, in which case HHS would carry out a coverage program in the state.
    • What relationship, if any, will be established between existing state high risk pools (which may use other eligibility criteria) and the federal pool?
    • If a state elects to not establish a new pool or a new federally funded pool alongside its own pool, what process will HHS use to establish a pool within the state?
    • How the high risk pool will work in states that do not use a high risk pool but already require their insurers to sell health insurance on a “guaranteed issue” basis, meaning that policies must be sold to individuals regardless of underlying health conditions?
  • For individuals: What will the application procedures and criteria be? How will individuals be expected to prove their citizenship or legal status, the existence of a pre-existing condition, and the absence of “creditable coverage” within the preceding six months? How will individuals learn about the pool and what types of assistance will they be able to receive at the time of application? What will be the initial enrollment date in a state, that is, when will a program actually be established? Will insurance be affordable to older people who are subject to the four-to-one premium ratio, and, if not, can the federal or state governments make subsidies available? Will plans made available be required to offer a minimum level of benefits?
  • For members: What appeals procedures will the Secretary establish so that members can appeal a “determination?” What actions by high risk pool insurers will be considered to be a “determination” for purposes of exercising appeals rights?
  • For insurers that participate in a state high risk pool: What procedures will be used to assure that qualification criteria are met both initially and on an ongoing basis? What types of data will insurers be required to submit and will the submission process be to federal or state regulators, or to both? Will the final federal standards include minimum benefit criteria?
  • For insurers and employer plans: what types of conduct will be considered risk dumping, and how will the identified circumstances in the law be interpreted and applied? What qualifies as a prohibited type of “financial consideration”? What does it mean to no longer actively market a particular policy? What meaning will be given to the concept of “prior coverage”? How will the Secretary decide if an insurer is impermissibly considering the duration of coverage from issue or health status at the time of renewal? What types of information will employer plans and issuers be required to submit and how will the Secretary monitor the insurance and benefit plan landscape for evidence of such conduct?
  • Overall federal management:  What process will the Secretary use to assure that in the aggregate expenditures do not exceed available funds? What types of adjustments may be made in the event that spending estimates are exceeded?

Recent Agency Action

HHS sent a letter to all states on April 2, 2010 soliciting their intent to participate. HHS also created this fact sheet on the temporary high risk pool program.

Authorized Funding Levels

Congress has authorized and made immediately available five billion dollars to support the program. The CMS actuary estimated that this would last for 2010 and part way into 2011. At that point, the program will need to be cut back.

Additional Resources


[1] P.L. 111-148, §2709(e) amending §1253 of the Act. See also March 29 letter from HHS Secretary Sebelius to Karen Ignani, President, America’s Health Insurance Plans.
[2] Tanya Schwartz, State High Risk Pools: An Overview (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2010) http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/8041.pdf (Accessed April 9, 2010).
[3] §1101(a).
[4] §1101(a).
[5] The term “creditable coverage” encompasses public and private health insurance as well as coverage under certain other arrangements such as the Indian Health Service. The term is defined in §2701(c) of the Public Health Service Act.
[6] §1101(d).
[7] §1101(c).
[8] See Glossary for definition.
[9] §1101(g).
[10] §1101(g)(5).
[11] §1101(b)(2).
[12] §1101(e).
[13] §1101(e).
[14] §1101(e)(2).
[15] §1101(e)(2).
[16] §1101(f).

P.L. 111-148, §2709(e) amending §1253 of the Act. See also March 29 letter from HHS Secretary Sebelius to Karen Ignani, President, America’s Health Insurance Plans.
Tanya Schwartz, State High Risk Pools: An Overview (Kaiser Family Foundation, 2010) http://www.kff.org/uninsured/upload/8041.pdf (Accessed April 9, 2010).
The term “creditable coverage” encompasses public and private health insurance as well as coverage under certain other arrangements such as the Indian Health Service. The term is defined in §2701(c) of the Public Health Service Act.
See Glossary for definition.

Comments (3)

  • Ellen Rautenberg says:

    It seems that what has been left out is allowing people who are underinsured into high risk pools. People with catastrophic or hospitalization-only policies have been unable to buy more comprehensive policies at any price or at affordable prices because of pre-existing conditions. It seems that they must either give up insurance for 6 months or wait until 2014. Any other solutions to this dilemna?

  • Kay Mobley says:

    I am 62 years of age, completed breast cancer treatment in Sept., 2009. Was laid off from my job in May, 2009. I have COBRA coverage. Do individuals with COBRA coverage have to be without insurance for 6 months to apply for this coverage?

    Thank you.

  • Mike W. says:

    I’m 62, I’ve recently had back surgery and my COBRA coverage has expired. In Colorado we have a high risk pool (CoverageColorado) which I found was my only choice for insurance. The premiums are high so I had to settle for a policy with $7500 out of pocket in order to have some coverage. However, it appears I’m unable to qualify for the $5950 out of pocket because I’ve been lucky to have insurance coverage up to this point…Suggestions ??

In an Interim Final Rule released Friday, the Centers for Medicare and Medicaid Services (CMS) stated that as of June 15th, payment rates for the federal Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) will be set to those of Medicare. Until the passage of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), many Americans with pre-existing conditions were denied insurance coverage or charged exorbitantly high premiums. PCIP, which was created under the ACA, was allocated $5 billion to enable those with pre-existing conditions to obtain insurance prior to 2014. 135,000 otherwise uninsured individuals with pre-existing conditions were granted coverage under PCIP, with claims averaging $32,108 per enrollee. Changes in PCIP payments were authorized in order to ensure program solvency until 2014. Enrollment in federal PCIP programs was capped in February due to funding concerns. Enrollment in the 27 state-operated PCIP programs was suspended several weeks later. As of now, 17 of the state-operated PCIP programs will be administered by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) for the duration of the year.
The Department of Labor (DOL) yesterday published an interim final rule that would provide regulations governing the employee protection (whistleblower) provision of section 1558 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The provision provides protections to employees of health insurance issuers or other employers who may have been subject to retaliation for reporting potential violations of the law’s consumer protections or affordability assistance provisions. This interim rule establishes procedures and time frames for the handling of retaliation complaints under section 18C.
Yesterday, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS) suspended enrollment in pre-existing condition insurance plans (PCIPs), effective March 2 of this year. The letter, sent from Richard Popper, the director of Insurance Plan Groups, to PCIP contractors, also included language regarding benefit adjustment analysis.
The Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) issued an amendment to an interim final rule to prevent young illegal aliens allowed to stay in the United States under President Obama's amnesty program from joining a high-risk insurance pool program. from joining high-risk insurance pool programs. The amendment modifies the 2010 interim final rule which implements the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) program. The purpose of PCIP is to enable people who have been uninsured for at least six months due to medical problems to obtain coverage at the same price as those without pre-existing conditions. PCIP will end in 2014 when plans are barred from charging more to consumers with medical problems. The amendment was released because the 2010 interim final rule held that individuals could enroll in these pools if they were citizens, nationals, or a "lawfully present" in the United States.
A recent analysis released by the Urban Institute for the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation indicated that 535,000 of America's 1.3 million uninsured veterans would receive health coverage if all states chose to expand their Medicaid programs. Under the Affordable Care Act (ACA), states may extend Medicaid eligibility to adults whose income falls below 138% of the federal poverty line. 121,000 uninsured veterans will be eligible for government subsidies through their state insurance marketplaces, but the remaining 414,000 will not qualify for subsidies because their incomes are too low, leaving Medicaid expansion as their only option for coverage. Of these individuals, around 218,000 reside in states that have either denied expansion or remain undecided.
An issue brief recently released by the Commonwealth Fund examines state action on a subset of Affordable Care Act provisions, including guaranteed access to coverage and a ban on preexisting condition exclusions. These protections go into effect in 2014. The analysis finds that, to date, only one state passed new legislation on all of these protections, and an additional 10 states and the District of Columbia passed new legislation or issued a new regulation on at least one of the two. The analysis also finds that some states face limitations in fully enforcing these reforms. According to the report, these findings suggest an acute need for states to take action in 2013 to help ensure that consumers are fully protected by and benefit from the ACA’s most significant reforms.
The Census Bureau report published yesterday found that the number of uninsured Americans fell to 48.6 million in 2011, or 15.7 percent of the population. This is the first drop in uninsured Americans since 2007. In 2010, 49.9 million people, or 16.3 percent of the population, were uninsured. Census Bureau officials attribute the drop in large part to provisions under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The drop in the number of uninsured Americans was fueled by a significant drop in uninsured young Americans aged 19 to 25, from 29.8 percent in 2010 to 27.7 percent in 2011, the Census Bureau said. The rate also decreased among seniors. The Bureau also found that the percentage of Americans covered by private insurance remained flat at 63.9 percent. The percentage of Americans covered by government programs increased for the fifth consecutive year to 32.2 percent in 2011.
The Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) Pre-Existing Condition Insurance Plan (PCIP) is the temporary, federal high-risk pool which will provide coverage to uninsured individuals with preexisting conditions until 2014, when exchange coverage becomes available. Nearly 78,000 people have enrolled since the program was implemented two years ago. An issue brief recently released by the Commonwealth Fund compares the PCIP with state-based high-risk pools that existed prior to the ACA. The paper discusses the programmatic differences that could have caused the lower-than-anticipated enrollment and higher-than-anticipated costs for the PCIP. PCIP coverage, like state high-risk pool coverage, likely remains unaffordable to most lower-income individuals with preexisting conditions, but provides much needed access to care for those able to afford it. Operational costs of these programs are also quite high, making them less than optimal as a means of broader coverage expansion.
A report recently published by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in collaboration with State Health Access Data Assistance Center analyzes recent trends in health insurance coverage for children at the state level between 2008 and 2010. The percentage of children with public coverage through Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) increased substantially, while rates of private coverage and uninsurance declined. However, the report found substantial variation across states. The main findings of this report include the following...
Effective January 2014, the Affordable Care Act (ACA) establishes a new minimum Medicaid eligibility level of 138 percent of poverty for non-disabled adults who were not previously eligible for the program. As with current Medicaid, legal immigrants who have been in the country for five years or fewer are not eligible for this coverage. Nationally, 21.5 million currently uninsured nonelderly adults may meet the income and citizenship criteria to be eligible for Medicaid after the expansion. A brief recently released by the Kaiser Family Foundation uses the American Community Survey to describe the low-income uninsured adult population -- the target group for the Medicaid expansion under the Affordable Care Act -- by state. Many people in this target population have substantial health needs and face barriers to health care, and nearly half have incomes of 50 percent of poverty or less.