HealthReformGPS is made possible through generous financial support from the RCHN Community Health Foundation. Visit them at

CRS report examines the ACA’s role in fiscal issues

Posted on October 17, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Implementation Briefs

The Affordable Care Act’s provisions to increase federal revenue through taxes on high-income workers are among the many proposals that policymakers will face next year, according to a new report released by the Congressional Research Service (CRS). The report provides an overview of the tax and spending policy changes set forth by the Act. Collectively referred to as the “fiscal cliff,” these policies would extend current revenue policies (e.g., extending the Bush tax cuts) and change current spending policies (e.g., not allowing the Budget Control Act sequester to take effect) to increase the projected budget deficit relative to current law. The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) estimates that if current law remains in place, the budget deficit will fall by $502 billion between FY2012 and FY2013.

In making these fiscal policy choices, Congress will have to weigh the benefits of deficit reduction against the potential implications of fiscal policy choices for the ongoing economic recovery. Maintaining current revenue and spending policies will add to the deficit, while increasing revenues and reducing spending, as under current law, could slow economic growth. Thus, deficit reduction measures must be balanced against concerns that spending cuts or tax increases could dampen an already weak economic recovery. CBO has concluded that allowing current law fiscal policies to take effect will dampen short-term economic growth, but accelerate long-term economic growth. Conversely, CBO has concluded that postponing the fiscal restraint would accelerate short-term economic growth, but dampen long-term economic growth. In that context, several policy observers have recommended implementing a credible medium-term plan that balances economic considerations with deficit reduction.

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

Several days ago, the Congressional Research Service (CRS) published a report describing how the appropriations impasse and government shutdown will impact the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The report provides background information on the ACA, particularly focusing upon how the law impacts federal spending. This information is followed by an explanation of the various legislative attempts to defund or amend the ACA, as well as legal and procedural considerations in using the appropriations process to attack the law. CRS concludes by examining how the government shutdown would impact ACA implementation. The report found that implementing the ACA would be largely unaffected by the government shutdown, because most of the federal agencies implementing the ACA will be able to rely upon funds outside of discretionary spending and several actions associated with implementing the ACA would be considered exceptions to the Antideficiency Act, the law that bars the federal government from performing certain tasks during a shutdown.
A report recently published by the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation in collaboration with State Health Access Data Assistance Center analyzes recent trends in health insurance coverage for children at the state level between 2008 and 2010. The percentage of children with public coverage through Medicaid or the Children’s Health Insurance Program (CHIP) increased substantially, while rates of private coverage and uninsurance declined. However, the report found substantial variation across states. The main findings of this report include the following...
The 2012 Towers Watson/National Business Group on Health Employer Survey on Purchasing Value in Health Care offers insights into the actions and plans of leading U.S. employers and views of what the future of employer-provided health care in the U.S. may look like this year and in the coming three years. According to the study, as health care costs continue to rise, employers are looking for ways to cut costs. While the total cost of health care is predicted to rise 5.3%, to $11,507 per employee in 2013, the growth is slowing. Many companies will keep premium increases in line with the health care cost increases. The study found that 13% of companies would increase premiums by 5% in 2013, for example.
The State Budget Crisis Task Force recently released a report identifying Medicaid growth as one of six major areas affecting states' fiscal stability. The others include federal deficit reduction efforts, underfunded retirement commitments, narrow and eroding tax bases, local governments' fiscal problems, and state laws. The report cited increasing enrollments, escalating health care costs, and difficulty implementing cost reduction proposals as reasons for Medicaid's rapid cost growth. The State Budget Crisis Task Force report also noted that Medicaid recently passed k-12 education as the largest area of state spending when all funds are considered. The report cites the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services (CMS), which found that Medicaid costs will likely grow at an average annual rate of 8.1 percent between 2012 and 2020 if the Affordable Care Act (ACA) reforms are implemented and at a rate of 6.6 percent if they are not. The U.S. Supreme Court upheld the ACA's Medicaid expansion provision but made it optional for the states.
The National Association of County and City Health Officials (NACCHO) surveyed local health departments (LHDs) nationwide to measure the impact of the economic recession on LHDs’ budgets, staff, and programs. Results of the study, the seventh in a series, show that many LHDs continue to struggle to serve their communities in the face of ongoing fiscal constraints. In 2011, 57 percent of LHDs reduced or eliminated services...
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released today an update on the budgetary impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Although overall projections are similar to those released in prior years, there are several important changes in this year's updated estimates. For example, in March 2010 when the ACA was enacted, CBO estimated that the number of uninsured individuals would fall by 32 million by 2019. Now CBO estimates that the number will only fall by 31 million by 2019, but by 33 million by 2022. The projections regarding health insurance coverage has also changed...
The National Commission on Fiscal Responsibility and Reform, otherwise known as the Debt Commission, recently released its report on the nation's fiscal crisis. The report, titled "The Moment of Truth," offers options and recommendations on how to reduce the U.S. national debt. The report includes numerous recommendations for health care savings and spending reductions, namely reforming the Medicare Sustainable Growth Rate and establishing a health care spending budget, among other recommendations.
Both the Senate and the House passed H.R.8 (89-8 and 257-167, respectively), the American Taxpayer Relief Act, on January 1, 2013. President Barack Obama signed the Act into law on January 3, 2013. The measure extends Bush-era income and other tax cuts for individuals and families making up to $400,000 and $450,000 respectively. For individuals and families above this income threshold, the bill increases taxes from 35% to 39.6%. H.R. 8 also postpones...
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the legislative branch agency responsible for estimating the cost of legislation, issued two reports on July 24th related to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The first report, revised cost and health insurance coverage estimates for the ACA in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in NFIB v. Sebelius[1]. In that ruling, the Court concluded the individual requirement to purchase health insurance coverage, while not a reasonable exercise of congressional Commerce Clause authority, is constitutional as a tax under congressional Spending Clause authority. The Court also held that the ACA’s Medicaid expansion, requiring states to cover all non-elderly individuals with incomes below 133[2] percent of the federal poverty level was unconstitutional. However, rather than striking the requirement, the Court precluded the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from enforcing the mandate by withholding all Medicaid funds. As a result of the ruling, states now have the option of expanding coverage to 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL), and will receive enhanced federal matching funds as provided under the law, but are not required to expand coverage.[3]