A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

Contraception Coverage within Required Preventive Services

Posted on March 2, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Key Developments
Implementation Briefs
Library

By Lara Cartwright-Smith

Background

Recent federal regulations requiring insurance coverage of contraception have generated controversy, especially as applied to religious employers. The requirement stems from an ACA provision requiring insurance coverage of preventive services.

The Affordable Care Act Provisions

Section 2713 of the Public Health Service Act, as added by Section 1001 of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA),[1] requires group health plans and health insurance issuers offering group or individual health insurance coverage to provide coverage without cost-sharing for certain preventive services, including preventive treatments and services for women recommended by The Health Resources and Services Administration (HRSA) in guidelines. The preventive services provisions of the Act do not apply to “grandfathered” plans,[2] but do apply to ERISA-governed group health plans that purchase insurance coverage and those that self-insure.[3]

The Implementing Regulations

On July 19, 2010, the Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services (HHS) jointly issued “Interim Final Rules for Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act”[4] (hereafter IFR). At that point, HRSA had not yet issued comprehensive guidelines but was expected to do so by August 1, 2011. Following a report by the Institute of Medicine recommending comprehensive coverage of contraceptive services,[5] HRSA issued guidelines on August 1, 2011, adopting the IOM recommendations.[6] Specifically, HRSA’s guidelines recommend health insurance coverage of “[a]ll Food and Drug Administration approved contraceptive methods, sterilization procedures, and patient education and counseling for all women with reproductive capacity,” as prescribed.[7] Shortly thereafter, on August 3, 2011, the Departments published an Amended Interim Final Rule (hereafter Amended IFR),[8] that incorporated HRSA’s Required Health Plan Coverage Guidelines for Women’s Preventive Services. The Amended IFR contained an additional 60-day public comment period but took effect as of August 1, 2011, so that mandatory coverage by non-grandfathered group and individual insurance plans of all preventive services without cost sharing would begin on August 1, 2012.

In response to comments on the 2010 initial IFR regarding the application of the preventive services requirement to religious employers, the Departments gave HRSA “additional discretion to exempt certain religious employers from the Guidelines where contraceptive services are concerned.”[9] The 2011 Amended IFR defined a religious employer, for purposes of the policy, as “one that: (1) has the inculcation of religious values as its purpose; (2) primarily employs persons who share its religious tenets; (3) primarily serves persons who share its religious tenets; and (4) is a non-profit organization under [certain sections of the Code].” This definition was based on definitions used by states that exempt religious employers from compliance with state mandates to cover contraceptive services. It is a narrow exemption that effectively covers churches and other religious houses of worship but not religiously-affiliated non-profit institutions such as hospitals, universities, and social service agencies.

On January 20, 2012, in response to concern around the narrow definition of religious exemption, the Secretary of HHS announced, without amending the 2011 Amended IFR,[10] that religiously-affiliated employers not covered by the exemption would have an additional year (until August 1, 2013) to comply with the Amended IFR. However, intense opposition to the narrow exemption, including the United States Conference of Catholic Bishops (USCCB),[11] led to a further refinement of the 2011 Amended IFR.

The February 2012 Final Rule

On February 10, 2012, the Administration released a final rule, designed to accommodate religiously-affiliated employers without broadening the original religious exemption.[12] The final policy[13] maintains the Amended IFR’s religious exemption and retains the one-year grace period for religiously-affiliated organizations that the Secretary had announced in January. In addition, for religiously-affiliated employers that are not exempted, the final rule announces the Administration’s intention to adopt a new policy that insurance companies providing coverage to such employers will be required to cover contraceptive services free of charge, so that the employer will not be compelled to provide contraceptive coverage, but the covered employees will still have access to contraceptive services (as defined in HRSA guidelines) without cost-sharing. (The mandate on insurers is not expected to result in higher costs for either insurers or employers and employees because of the cost-reducing impact of contraceptive coverage on plan premiums).[14] The final rule codifies the 2011 Amended IFR without any modification, but in the preamble to the final rule, the Departments state their intent to produce a new rule during the one-year grace period for religiously-affiliated employers (the “temporary enforcement safe harbor”) that will set forth the requirements for insurers.[15]

Key Issues

A broader religious exemption? The accommodation has not quelled support among numerous interest groups for a broader religious exemption reaching all religiously-affiliated employers (and for some advocates, all employers that claim a conscience-based objection to coverage of contraceptive services). Advocates for a broader exemption have issued statements rejecting the compromise policy announced in the final rule[16] and the Senate Minority Leader announced his intention to introduce legislation to overturn the preventive services mandate.[17] Whether these efforts will succeed is unclear, but it is notable that 28 states already require insurance coverage of contraception,[18] and both state and federal courts have upheld public health laws when universally and non-discriminatorily applied.[19] In addition, some religious organizations have praised the Administration’s accommodation.[20]

Self-insured plans? Many religiously-affiliated employers’ health plans are self-insured, meaning that the employer bears the cost of employees’ health claims rather than an insurance company. How the final rule will accommodate these employers is not yet clear and was not specifically addressed in the February rule. The Obama Administration will consider this issue further during the safe harbor period.[21]



[1] The Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, Pub. L. 111-148 (2009), as amended by the Health Care and Education Affordability Reconciliation Act, Pub. L. 111-152 (2010). Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/PLAW-111publ148/pdf/PLAW-111publ148.pdf.
[2] ACA § 1251. See also Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Coverage Relating to Status as
a Grandfathered Health Plan Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act; Interim Final Rule and Proposed Rule. 75 FR 34538 (June 17, 2010).
[3] ACA §1563(e) (adding new § 715(a)(1) to ERISA
[4] Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services. Interim Final Rules for Group Health
Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 75 Fed. Reg. 41726 (July 19, 2010). http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2010-07-19/pdf/2010-17242.pdf.
[5] Institute of Medicine. Clinical Preventive Services for Women: Closing the Gaps (July 19, 2011). Available at: http://www.iom.edu/Reports/2011/Clinical-Preventive-Services-for-Women-Closing-the-Gaps.aspx.
[6] Department of Health and Human Services, Health Resources and Services Administration. Required Health Plan Coverage Guidelines for Women’s Preventive Services (August 1, 2011). Available at: http://www.hrsa.gov/womensguidelines/.
[7] HRSA Required Health Plan Coverage Guidelines for Women’s Preventive Services, supra note 6.
[8] Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services. Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act. 76 Fed. Reg. 46621 (August 3, 2011). Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2011-08-03/pdf/2011-19684.pdf.
[9] 76 Fed. Reg. 46623.
[10] News Release: A statement by U.S. Department of Health and Human Services Secretary Kathleen Sebelius (Jan. 20, 2012). Available at: http://www.hhs.gov/news/press/2012pres/01/20120120a.html.
[11] White House, religious groups in fight over doctrine, religious freedom and contraception. Associated Press (Feb. 3, 2012). Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/national/health-science/white-house-religious-groups-in-fight-over-doctrine-religious-freedom-and-contraception/2012/02/03/gIQAFe3ImQ_story.html.
[12] White House. Fact Sheet: Women’s Preventive Services and Religious Institutions (Feb. 10, 2012). Available at: http://www.whitehouse.gov/the-press-office/2012/02/10/fact-sheet-women-s-preventive-services-and-religious-institutions
[13] Departments of Treasury, Labor, and Health and Human Services. Final Rules: Group Health Plans and Health Insurance Issuers Relating to Coverage of Preventive Services Under the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act, 77 Fed. Reg. 8725 (Feb. 15, 2012). Available at: http://www.gpo.gov/fdsys/pkg/FR-2012-02-15/pdf/2012-3547.pdf.
[14] White House Fact Sheet, supra n. 12; Final Rules, supra n. 13, at p. 8728. See also Assistant Secretary for Planning and Evaluation, Department of Health and Human Services. Issue Brief: The Cost of Covering Contraceptives through Health Insurance (Feb. 2012). Available at: http://aspe.hhs.gov/health/reports/2012/contraceptives/ib.shtml.
[15] Final Rule, supra n. 13, at pp. 8728-9.
[16] United States Conference of Catholic Bishops. News Release: Bishops Renew Call to Legislative Action on Religious Liberty (Feb. 10, 2012). Available at: http://www.usccb.org/news/2012/12-026.cfm.
[17] Anne Flaherty. Top Republican calls for legislation exempting any organization from birth control mandate. Associated Press. Available at: http://www.startribune.com/politics/national/139182299.html
[18] Julie Rovner. Rules Requiring Contraceptive Coverage Have Been in Force for Years. NPR News (Feb. 10, 2012). Available at: http://www.npr.org/blogs/health/2012/02/10/146662285/rules-requiring-contraceptive-coverage-have-been-in-force-for-years.
[19] Id.
[20] Statement of Sr. Carol Keenan, President, Catholic Health Association. “Catholic Health Association is Very Pleased with Today’s White House Resolution that Protects Religious Liberty and Conscience Rights.” (Feb. 10, 2012). Available at: http://chausa.org/Pages/Newsroom/Releases/2012/Catholic_Health_Association_is_Very_Pleased_with_Todays_White_House_Resolution_that_Protects_Religious_Liberty_and_Conscience_Rights/; Association of Jesuit Colleges and Universities. ACJU statement on change to HHS mandate for religious institutions. (Feb. 10. 2012) (“acknowledges and appreciates the compromise that President Obama has made to accommodate religious institutions in regard to the birth control mandate under the Affordable Care Act.”) Available at: http://www.ajcunet.edu/index.aspx?bid=992; Catholics United. Press Release: Catholics United Supports Obama Administration’s New Compromise Regulation on HHS Contraception Rule (Feb. 10, 2012). Available at: http://www.catholics-united.org/content/press-release-catholics-united-supports-obama-administrations-new-compromise-regulation-hhs-
[21] N. C. Aizenman, Peter Wallsten, and Karen Tumulty. Obama shifts course on birth control rule to calm Catholic leaders’ outrage. Washington Post (Feb. 10, 2012). Available at: http://www.washingtonpost.com/politics/white-house-to-announce-adjustment-to-birth-control-rule/2012/02/10/gIQArbFy3Q_story.html.

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

In a joint rule released by the US Department of Health and Human Services (HHS), the US Department of the Treasury (DoT), and the US Department of Labor (DoL), the administration finalized the requirement for employers to offer contraception coverage through their workplace health insurance policies. The rule defines a "religious employer" to include predominantly churches and houses of worship. For religiously-affiliated institutions, such as universities, the rule provides a simplified process by which insurance companies can cover contraceptives for employees. Religiously-affiliated entities using self-insured plans can use the same streamlined approach for a third-party administrator to provide contraceptives. In addition to the rule, the administration extended the safe harbor for religiously-affiliated hospitals and universities, which prevented those institutions from fines associated with non-compliance to the contraception mandate, through January.
The Departments of Labor, Health and Human Services (HHS) and Treasury have jointly prepared a new set of Frequently Asked Questions (FAQs) regarding implementation of various provisions of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The twelfth installment of the set, these FAQs answer questions from stakeholders to help people understand the new law and benefit from it, as intended. This round of FAQs covers cost-sharing limitations and coverage of preventive services. The FAQs state that employers cannot limit contraceptive coverage to oral contraceptives only. The Obama administration also specifies that over-the-counter contraceptives that are FDA-approved and prescribed by a doctor are included as required coverage. Of particular note, this FAQ addressed the administration's decision to delay caps on out-of-pocket spending for group plans not participating in the Exchanges for 2014. Under the ACA, co-payments and deductibles were intended to be capped at $6,350 for individuals and $12,700 for families annually. Effectively, insurance issuers may set their own limit, or set no limit at all, for the first year of ACA implementation. Of particular note, this FAQ addressed the administration's decision to delay caps on out-of-pocket spending for plan beneficiaries for 2014. Under the ACA, co-payments and deductibles were intended to be capped at $6,350 for individuals and $12,700 for families annually. Effectively, insurance issuers may set their own limit, or set no limit at all, for the first year of ACA implementation.
On February 1, 2013, the Centers for Medicare & Medicaid Services’ (CMS’) Center for Medicaid and CHIP Services released a State Medicaid Director letter regarding implementation of section 1406 of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Section 4106(b) establishes a one percentage point increase in the federal medical assistance percentage (FMAP), effective January 1, 2013, applied to expenditures for adult vaccines and clinical preventive services for states that cover, without cost-sharing, the full list of ACA preventive services. Specifically, the preventive services covered under the policy are those assigned a grade of A or B by the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force and the approved vaccines are those recommend by the Advisory Committee on Immunization Practices. For a complete list of the preventive services covered under the policy, click here and for a complete list of covered vaccines, click here.
The Obama administration issued proposed rules for public comment regarding contraceptive coverage with no cost sharing under the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The proposed rules provide women with coverage for preventive care that includes contraceptive services with no co-pays. Importantly, the rule accounts for concerns of some religious organizations by extending accommodations that provide enrollees separate contraceptive coverage with no co-pays, but at no cost to the religious organization. Insured plans: For insured plans, including student health plans, the religious organizations would be required to provide notice to their insurer. The insurer would then be responsible for notifying enrollees that it is providing them with no-cost contraceptive coverage through separate individual health insurance policies. Self-insured plans: For self-insured plans, as well as student health plans, religions organizations would be required to notify third party administrators. The third party administrator would then work with an insurer to arrange no-cost contraceptive coverage through separate policies. Additionally, the proposed rules provide a detailed definition of "religious employer” for the purposes of the exemption. Click here for a fact sheet.
The ACA requires all individual and non-grandfathered group health plans to cover certain preventive services, including contraceptive services. This is an update to the March 2012 brief on Contraception Coverage within Required Preventive Services, and to the April 2012 update to that brief.
Preventive services are optional for traditional Medicaid beneficiaries[1] ages 21 and older who are covered under the standard Medicaid program. Young adults ages 18-21 remain entitled to EPSDT benefits, which encompass periodic and as-needed health exams, all age-appropriate immunizations, and other preventive services.
Hobby Lobby, a Christian-run arts and crafts chain, filed for an emergency injunction on December 21, 2012 with the Supreme Court to block President Obama's birth control coverage rules. Hobby Lobby's complaint surrounds the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) requirement that most employers cover contraception without copay. Yesterday, the Supreme Court today denied Hobby Lobby's request, which was joined by the Christian book company, Mardel. The U.S. Supreme Court said it will not decide the case before lower courts have ruled. Justice Sonia Sotomayor argued that the petitioners did not meet the standards requisite for a preliminary injunction. The court also denied the request that the court take up the entire case, in which they argue that the ACA's contraceptive coverage requirement forces them to violate their religious beliefs. The case will return to the district court for a ruling on the merits of whether the Obama administration can require employers who have religious objections to contraceptive coverage to provide said insurance coverage in their employer plan.
The Supreme Court on Monday ordered the Fourth Circuit Court of Appeals to examine the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act's (ACA's) employer requirement to cover contraceptives without a co-pay. This move could put the ACA in front of the Supreme Court again as early as next year. The order was in response to a request from Liberty University, one of the groups that sued over the mandate in 2010. After the June ruling, the Supreme Court dismissed Liberty's entire lawsuit. Over this past summer, Liberty asked the Supreme Court to reopen the arguments pertaining to the employer mandate and the contraceptive coverage mandate. The court agreed to the request and today's order instructs the Fourth Circuit to review both pieces of the argument.
On Friday, U.S. District Judge Reggie Walton granted a preliminary injunction to Tyndale House Publishers, enabling the company to reject the Affordable Care Act (ACA) provision which requires employers to provide its employees with contraceptive coverage. The company argued that it does not want to cover contraceptives, as it  views them as abortions. Plan B and IUDs are the contraceptives at issue in the case. If a woman is already pregnant, the Plan B pill has no effect. Plan B merely prevents ovulation or fertilization of an egg. Plan B can also prevent a fertilized egg from implanting on the uterine wall. IUDs mainly work by blocking sperm, but may also have the same anti-implantation effect. According to Tyndale, this implantation prevention is not morally different than abortion. Tyndale president and CEO Mark D. Taylor filed the lawsuit against the U.S. Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) last month, arguing that the provision causes employers to violate their religious beliefs. In his decision, Judge Walton acknowledged that the government has interests in promoting public health and ensuring that women have equal access to health care, but he said that the government has not offered proof that the ACA's contraceptive coverage provision furthers these interests.