A project of the George Washington University's Hirsh Health Law and Policy Program and the Robert Wood Johnson Foundation

CBO re-scores ACA in light of SCOTUS decision

Posted on July 24, 2012 | No Comments

PDF Version
Details
Library
Editor's Comment
Implementation Briefs

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) and the Joint Committee on Tax (JCT) have revised their estimates of the total cost of the Affordable Care Act (ACA) as a result of the Supreme Court’s ruling that essentially makes State expansion of Medicaid eligibility optional. CBO and JCT now estimate that the coverage provision in the ACA will cost $84 billion less over 10 years, coming in at $1,168 billion over the 2012–2022 period. This is down from their original score of $1,252 billion, issued in March of 2012.

In a separate analysis, CBO and JCT have also scored H.R. 6079, a bill to fully repeal the ACA. If enacted as currently written, CBO and JCT estimate that H.R. 6079 will reduce spending by $890 billion and reduce revenues by $1 trillion over the 9 year period of 2013-2022, for a total of $109 billion added to the federal deficit during that time.

Stay tuned to HealthReformGPS.org for additional in-depth analyses of the CBO estimate.

No Comments

Public comments are closed.

The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) recently updated their cost estimate for the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The new estimate states that the ACA will cost $1.383 trillion over the next ten years, which is $104 billion less than the February estimate. The CBO states that the readjustment can be attributed to administrative changes, changes in the law, judicial decisions, new data (such as projected healthcare expenditures for both the private and public sectors), and changes in modeling.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), in conjunction with the Joint Committee on Taxation (JCT), issued updated budget projections for fiscal years 2014-2023, which include updated impact estimates of the insurance provisions in the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Slower than anticipated growth in health care spending, particularly in programs such as Medicare and Medicaid, is one of several factors that influenced the revised estimates...
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) today released an economic outlook, which predicts that consumers will not enroll in the Affordable Care Act’s (ACA's) health insurance marketplaces and expanded Medicaid programs as quickly as previously estimated. Lower Projected Costs for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program: According to the report, the ACA will increase the number of people enrolled in Medicaid by 12 million in 2022, as opposed to the 11 million estimated in August 2012. Despite this difference, the projected costs for Medicaid and the Children’s Health Insurance Program are $93 billion (or 14 percent) below the earlier projection for the 2013–2022 period, Higher Enrollment in and Subsidies for Coverage Through Exchanges: The report estimates that the costs of subsidies for insurance obtained through the exchanges and for related spending over the 2013–2022 period is now $32 billion (or about 3 percent) higher than it was in August, mostly due to higher projected enrollment in the exchanges.  All told, the report projects that 26 million people will be enrolled in the insurance exchanges in 2022, about 500,000 more than estimated in the August 2012 report. Fewer People with Employment-Based Coverage: In 2022, according to the report, 7 million fewer people will have employment-based health insurance as a result of the ACA; in August, that figure was estimated to be about 4 million people.
The Congressional Budget Office presents the long-term budget outlook under two scenarios in a new report. These scenarios embody different assumptions regarding future policies governing federal revenues and spending. The first, the extended baseline scenario, reflects the assumption that current laws generally remain unchanged and that lawmakers will allow changes that are schedule under current law to occur, forgoing adjustments routinely made in the past that have boosted deficits. The second, the extended alternative fiscal scenario, incorporates the assumptions that certain policies that have been in place for a number of years will continue and some provisions of law that might be difficult to sustain for a long period will be modified. These two scenarios span a wide range of possible policy choices. The report focuses on the next 25 years and gives special focus to outlays for major health care programs. Under both scenarios, the report estimates that total outlays for federal health care programs will grow much faster than the gross domestic product (GDP), increasing from 5.4 percent of the GDP in 2012 to nearly 10 percent in 2037. National health care spending is also expected to rise. Health care expenditures is expected to increase to almost one-quarter of the GDP by 2037. CBO suggested that key factors contributing to this growth in spending have been the emergence of new medical technologies, rising personal income, and the expanding scope of health insurance coverage.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) released today an update on the budgetary impact of the Affordable Care Act (ACA). Although overall projections are similar to those released in prior years, there are several important changes in this year's updated estimates. For example, in March 2010 when the ACA was enacted, CBO estimated that the number of uninsured individuals would fall by 32 million by 2019. Now CBO estimates that the number will only fall by 31 million by 2019, but by 33 million by 2022. The projections regarding health insurance coverage has also changed...
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has released a report to Congress analyzing the bugetary implications of legislation that permanently prevents the use of appropriated funds in Affordable Care Act (ACA) implementation. The analysis, submitted by CBO and the Joint Tax Commission (JCT) to Congressman Henry Waxman (D-CA) at his request, finds that the effects of a permanent prohibition on appropriated funds would largely depend on the Obama Administration's interpretation of such a prohibition. CBO and JCT also found it difficult to measure the magnitude of effects on the deficit because any potential savings realized by reductions in spending might be offset by a significant loss in revenues resulting from the prohibition.
Since the 2010 enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), the Congressional Budget Office (CBO) has issued a series of cost and coverage impact estimates. This post summarizes these evolving CBO cost and impact estimates which consider the ACA through a rolling 10-year framework.
The Congressional Budget Office (CBO), the legislative branch agency responsible for estimating the cost of legislation, issued two reports on July 24th related to the Affordable Care Act (ACA). The first report, revised cost and health insurance coverage estimates for the ACA in the wake of the Supreme Court ruling in NFIB v. Sebelius[1]. In that ruling, the Court concluded the individual requirement to purchase health insurance coverage, while not a reasonable exercise of congressional Commerce Clause authority, is constitutional as a tax under congressional Spending Clause authority. The Court also held that the ACA’s Medicaid expansion, requiring states to cover all non-elderly individuals with incomes below 133[2] percent of the federal poverty level was unconstitutional. However, rather than striking the requirement, the Court precluded the Secretary of the Department of Health and Human Services (HHS) from enforcing the mandate by withholding all Medicaid funds. As a result of the ruling, states now have the option of expanding coverage to 133 percent of the federal poverty level (FPL), and will receive enhanced federal matching funds as provided under the law, but are not required to expand coverage.[3]
Since the enactment of the Affordable Care Act (ACA), at least 27 lawsuits have been filed challenging the constitutionality of various provisions of the law. While nearly half of the lawsuits have been dismissed on procedural grounds, three district courts have found provisions challenged to be constitutional, and three have found them to be unconstitutional. Previous HealthReform GPS Implementation briefs/updates have discussed these lower court decisions. Following appeals of each of these rulings, the United States Courts of Appeals in the Fourth, Sixth, and Eleventh Circuits have now issued decisions as well. Most importantly, the appellate decisions continue to reflect a split in judicial opinion regarding the constitutionality of the Affordable Care Act’s individual mandate. Other important issues addressed by the appellate rulings concerned the constitutionality of the ACA Medicaid expansion and the question of whether the trial court in the Virginia cases (Liberty University v. Geithner and Commonwealth of Virginia v. Sebelius) had the authority to hear the cases at all.
A fifth U.S. District Court has issued a decision on a challenge to the constitutionality of the Patient Protection and Affordable Care Act (ACA) in Mead et al. v. Holder et al., finding the law is constitutional. Although legal challenges to the ACA have not been limited to the individual requirement to maintain health insurance coverage, the vast majority of cases have focused on this provision, commonly referred to as the individual mandate. To date, three district courts have held that Congress has the authority to require purchase of health insurance coverage as a reasonable exercise of its Commerce Clause powers, and two have struck down the provision as unconstitutional. A Florida district court has gone one step further, holding that the individual mandate, as an essential part of the ACA, was non-severable from the remainder of the Act and, as a result, struck down the entire statute.